Our family is:Irresponsible. Immoral. Weird. Over-sexed. Terrible parents. Infection-ridden. Adulterers. Potential jealous murderers. Some critics weep about us, others think we're hefty contributors to the End of Days. We men are everything from the world's most beta males -- pussy-whipped ad nauseam -- to shag-happy grade-A shits. (I do believe those are all the chief orifices covered in half a sentence.) Oh, and the women? Sluts, control freaks, or both.
That's what some commenters and commentators have said about us.
Lor' love a duck! If I want to hear that kind of language, I can get it at home.
I've been chatting about all this with Terisa. She -- and Scott & Larry, but she perhaps in particular -- has been a target much longer than I.
"Does it bother you, even a little bit?" she asked.
"No," I said. "Besides, they don't know us personally."
I was tempted to say that I'd always rather people would say something nice instead (or at least pick up young Edwin's bar tab once in a while). But even that's not true: not in the advocacy sense. We're trying to show that polyamory can work okay in a regular street, with regular people, and that there's no need to hush it up. This is a wee bit off the grid, so it'd be suspicious to hear only approval. Nobody kicks a dead dog, right?
But there is one kind of angst about us that could be more demoralizing, if allowed to be so.
It is the kind that I'm not sure is even there. I catch it out of the corner of my eye, but can't quite locate it if I look straight at it. It bothers me more if it emanates from friends and colleagues. It's best described as a suspicion that, in some muddy way, we have let the side down or gone strange. That we are like a drunk from whom, for now, it is best to tiptoe away until he has slept it off.
This can be hard to handle, because it is hard to address. Perhaps people are staying quiet because they are simply too busy to care. Actually, I'm certain this is often the case. But with other folks, broaching the whole issue with them can seem self-conscious. So I just let it be. I figure they'll come and chat, if they feel like it. Meanwhile, perhaps they'll get the occasional glimpse of us with our partners when we don't think anyone's looking: at the grocery store, or whatever. Hopefully, that will say a thing or two.
There are also the boatloads of support we have.
Quite apart from which, there's another reason why I try not to grumble about negative comment. That is: we've kinda asked for it. We could have stayed private, but chose to stick our heads above the parapet. This does not excuse irrational or hateful content in the brickbats leveled at us. But I guess we knew that people would gnash their teeth and turn the air a vivid blue. Fair enough, guv.
I live with my two male partners, one partner's wife, and their toddler. In general our friend circle has been extremely supportive or simply passive about our relationship status. They see that we're functional, and that our ups and downs are normal like theirs. I'm sorry you're receiving external flack about your life, but like you suggest it's not worth paying attention to (unless it's threatening, of course, to your family).
ReplyDelete@Meredith. Thanks. Interesting to hear about your family. Am so glad about the support/tolerance you receive.
ReplyDeleteI agree re. external flack. And to iterate what I mentioned in passing in my post: we do get a lot of support, too, which is terrific.
Cheers!
While not poly, I definitely live well apart from most "normal" society and I while I don't know that you call it out specifically, I find the dance between trying to live within society while so obviously apart from it a tenuous dance.
ReplyDeleteTo what extent do we demonstrate and celebrate our differences in the hopes that others my find our example at least thought provoking and move the societal dialog forward and when does it just become something else (my own ego perhaps)?
I am still considering and balancing my desire to be "open" against your post regarding what to share vs. what not to share (different context, but it seems highly correlated).
As usual, thanks for your insights. Your posts always get me to thinking...
@Lance: thanks for your thoughtful comment.
ReplyDeleteI think that, in many instances, it's OK to have a variety of motives concurrently (oh, hark at me: poly thought patterns even heree, LOL!)
Example: someone might work for a particular charity because they are truly committed to its goals, AND because it provides that person with an income.
So a bit of ego or self-interest thrown into a mix of more altruistic motives seems reasonable to me. After all, to use a simple instance, it'd be sad if someone stopped helping others just because she felt guilty about getting a warm glow alongside the constructive results of doing the good deeds.